Editorial Guidelines & Medical Review

Purpose of This Document

At Icarus Behavioral Health, we are dedicated to providing accurate, compassionate, and evidence-based information about mental health and addiction treatment as well as related topics on recovery.

As an accredited by the Joint Commission with the Gold Seal of Approval, we uphold the highest standards of ethical content creation.

Our editorial guidelines ensure that all information is reliable, up-to-date, and aligned with clinical best practices from organizations like SAMHSA, ASAM, and the FDA. We believe transparency builds trust. We hold ourselves to high standards of accuracy, responsibility, and ethical practice.

Our Editorial Mission

Icarus Behavioral Health exists to help individuals and families understand addiction, recovery, and the options available to them.

Our mission is to:

Provide accurate, research-backed information about substance use and mental health
Explain treatment options, levels of care, and what to expect from recovery
Help readers navigate insurance coverage and access to care
Offer a directory of licensed treatment facilities for those ready to explore options
Reduce confusion during a difficult and often overwhelming time

We do not tell people what to do. We provide the information and guidance needed to make informed decisions alongside qualified professionals.

How Content Is Created

Every piece of content on Icarus Behavioral Health follows a structured creation process designed for accuracy and clarity.

Step 1: Topic Research

Our editorial team identifies topics based on:

– Questions commonly asked by individuals and families seeking help

– Gaps in publicly available recovery education

– Updates in clinical guidelines, insurance policies, or treatment standards

– Feedback from readers and healthcare professionals

Step 2: Content Development

Content is written by experienced writers with backgrounds in health communication, addiction education, or recovery journalism. Writers follow internal style guidelines that prioritize:

– Plain language accessible to general audiences
– Compassionate, non-judgmental tone
– Clear structure with headings and short paragraphs
– Proper citation of sources

Step 3: Review and Approval

Before publication, content undergoes review by one or more qualified reviewers depending on the subject matter. This process is detailed in the section below.

Step 4: Publication and Monitoring

Published content is monitored for reader feedback, questions, and potential inaccuracies. We treat every page as a living document subject to updates as new information becomes available.

Fact-Checking Standards

We do not publish content that makes unsupported medical claims or promises specific treatment outcomes. Accuracy is non-negotiable for health-related content. Our fact-checking standards include:

Source verification: Claims must be supported by reputable sources such as peer-reviewed research, government health agencies (SAMHSA, NIDA, CDC), or recognized medical institutions
Data accuracy: Statistics and numerical data are verified against original sources before inclusion
Currency: We prioritize recent data and note when older studies are referenced
Multiple source confirmation: Key claims are cross-referenced with at least two independent sources when possible
Clear attribution: Sources are cited or linked within content so readers can verify information independently

Our Review Team

Content on Icarus Behavioral Health is reviewed by qualified professionals based on the topic. This multi-layer review process ensures appropriate expertise is applied to each subject area.

Medical Reviewers (MD / RN)

Content covering medical topics, including withdrawal, detoxification, medication-assisted treatment, and physical health effects of substance use, is reviewed by licensed physicians or registered nurses with relevant clinical experience.

Medical reviewers verify:

– Accuracy of clinical information
– Appropriate safety warnings and disclaimers
– Alignment with current medical guidelines

Mental Health Reviewers (Licensed Clinicians)

Content addressing mental health conditions, dual diagnosis, therapy modalities, and psychological aspects of addiction is reviewed by licensed mental health professionals such as licensed clinical social workers (LCSW), licensed professional counselors (LPC), or psychologists.

Insurance and Admissions Specialists

Content related to insurance coverage, verification processes, payment options, and admissions procedures is reviewed by professionals with direct experience in treatment admissions and healthcare billing.

These reviewers ensure:

– Accuracy of insurance-related information
– Clarity around verification and authorization processes
– Realistic expectations for coverage and costs

Military and TRICARE Reviewers

Content specific to veterans, active-duty service members, and TRICARE beneficiaries is reviewed by individuals with expertise in military healthcare systems and veteran-specific recovery resources.

Recovery and Lived Experience Reviewers

We believe lived experience adds essential perspective to recovery content. Individuals in long-term recovery review content for:

– Tone and language that respects the recovery community
– Accuracy of descriptions about the recovery experience
– Avoidance of stigmatizing language or harmful stereotypes

This review layer helps ensure our content resonates with those who have walked the path of recovery themselves.

Meet Our Caring Expert Staff

Image of Jennifer Howell

Jennifer Howell

Therapist, CADC, CADC II, CADC-S

Debroah

Deborah Baum

Clinical Director, PMHNP

Dr. Ehab Abdallah

Dr Ehab Abdallah

Psychiatrist, M.D

Image of Heather Raley

Heather Raley

Intake Coordinator

Image of Miya Stafford

Miya Stafford

VP Operations

Image of Dwayne Brown

Dwayne Brown

Therapist, CADC, CADC-S

Image of Vonzella Jenkins

Vonzella Jenkins

Operations Manager

Rachel Lissor

Rachel Lissor

Business Development Liaison

Update and Review Cadence

Health information changes. Treatment standards evolve. Insurance policies shift. We are committed to keeping our content current and accurate.

Regular Review Schedule

– Core educational pages are reviewed at minimum once per year
– Time-sensitive content (insurance information, policy changes, emerging trends) is reviewed quarterly or as updates occur
– High-traffic pages receive priority review and more frequent updates

Triggers for Immediate Review

Content is flagged for immediate review when:

– New clinical guidelines are released by authoritative bodies
– Readers report potential inaccuracies
– Significant policy or regulatory changes occur
– Internal quality audits identify concerns

Date Transparency

Where applicable, pages display the date of last review or update so readers can assess the currency of information.

Corrections Policy

We take errors seriously. When inaccuracies are identified, we act promptly and transparently.

How We Handle Corrections

Correction: If an error is confirmed, the content is updated with accurate information
Verification: The editorial team investigates the reported issue and consults with appropriate reviewers
Identification: Errors may be identified through internal review, reader feedback, or external notification
Documentation: Significant corrections are noted on the page with a brief explanation of what was changed and when

Reporting an Error

If you believe content on Icarus Behavioral Health contains an error, please contact us. We welcome feedback and take all reports seriously.

Phone: (505)305-0902

We do not remove content simply because it is unfavorable to a particular organization or viewpoint. Corrections are made based on factual accuracy, not preference.

Questions About Our Editorial Standards

We believe in open communication. If you have questions about how we create content, who reviews it, or how we maintain accuracy, we encourage you to reach out.

Call: (505)305-0902

Our team is available to discuss our editorial practices and answer questions about the information on our site.

This policy was established to uphold the highest standards of accuracy, transparency, and responsibility in addiction recovery education. We review and update this document as our processes evolve.